🔗 Share this article Moscow Demands Substantial Amount in Damages from Euroclear Regarding Frozen Funds The Russian central bank has announced it is pursuing compensation valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This action is a clear warning from the Kremlin regarding proposals to use immobilized Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine. The Legal Claim Based on accounts in Russian state media, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand. European Union officials are set to determine later this week on a plan to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme involves granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and financial stability. Most of these assets, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised financial reserves. Divergent Legal Views EU authorities have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. They argue is based on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was frozen in EU jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine. The Russian government, in contrast, has called any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of reciprocal actions, such as confiscating EU corporate holdings within Russia. Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has assumed a key role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal. Strategic Positioning In comments seen as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a severe assault on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States." The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past stated it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions. Enforcement Challenges Although judges in European nations are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin. "The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that relevant holdings can be identified," commented a lawyer from an international firm. EU Countermeasures EU officials indicated they are working on measures to deter other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against EU companies. They are also designing protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation." The Proposed Loan Mechanism Under the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched. Kyiv would only be obligated to repay the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast damage inflicted during the nearly four-year war. Other Funding Ideas Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative method for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget. This alternative move, however, demands full agreement among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its objection. Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, said the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also significant," she stated. "It also sends a clear signal that if you cause all this destruction to another nation, you have to pay for the rebuilding."